Virtual week and actual week: Age‐related differences in prospective memory

By Peter G. Rendell, Fergus I. M. Craik. 2000

375 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/965b33a357d33d54d7c26d36b1e152da2d16693c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Julie D. Henry
2. John R. Crawford
3. Louise H. Phillips
4. Mairi MacLeod
5. Peter G. Rendell

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Julie D. Henry
2. John R. Crawford
3. Louise H. Phillips
4. Mairi MacLeod
5. Peter G. Rendell
6. M. Demir
7. P. Norton
8. P. McCarthy

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. Julie D. Henry
2. John R. Crawford
3. Peter G. Rendell
4. G. Michael

Citations in the corpus

• A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. (2004, background): “…TBPM and EBPM were positively related to age in naturalistic conditions (rs ϭ .52 and 1 Partially overlapping groups were permitted on four occasions; Rendell and Craik (2000), Rendell and Thomson (1999), and Maylor (1998) compared the same young group against independent older groups; Einstein et…”
• A Review of Virtual Week for Prospective Memory Assessment: Clinical Implications (2009, methodology): “In this initial study, Rendell and Craik (2000) compared three age groups, young adults (19–24 years), young–old (61–73 years) and old–old (75–84 years).”