A logic-based theory of deductive arguments

By P. Besnard, Anthony Hunter. Artificial Intelligence, 2001

529 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Using arguments for making and explaining decisions (2009, background): “[3,13,46]), and their handling does not make new problems in the general setting of Section 2, even in the decision process perspective of this paper.”
A general account of argumentation with preferences (2013, methodology): “Much recent work on structured argumentation formalises arguments as minimal classical consequences from consistent and finite premise sets in standard propositional or first-order logic [5, 12, 13, 26].”
Argumentation in artificial intelligence (2007, methodology): “Treatments of argumentation using this model are provided in a series of papers by Besnard and Hunter [39,40,102,103]; the relationship between deductive frameworks and AFs is examined in a recent paper of Wooldridge et al.”
A Relevance-theoretic Framework for Constructing and Deconstructing Enthymemes (2012, background): “[PS97, AC02, BH01 , GS04, Hun07]), which assume that efficient algorithms for argumentation will continue to be developed that ameliorate the associated cost (see [BH08a] for a discussion).”