Principles of Risk Minimization for Learning Theory
By Vladimir Naumovich Vapnik. 1991
Subfields: Statistical Learning Theory
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistical Learning Theory
- Mehryar Mohri
- Yishay Mansour
- Nan Jiang
- Ananda Theertha Suresh
- Yoshua Bengio
- Richard L. Lewis
- Homa Alemzadeh
- Alexander Luedtke
Citations in the corpus
- Three Approaches for Personalization with Applications to Federated Learning (2020, methodology): “This can be trained using either standard empirical risk minimization (Vapnik, 1992) or other methods such as agnostic risk minimization (Mohri et al., 2019).”
- Deep learning in neural networks: An overview (2014, methodology): “, Wang, Z., Eickholt, J., and Cheng, J. (2009). NN con: improved protein contact map prediction using 2D-recursive neural networks.”
- Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networks (2016, background): “Traditionally, the correctness of a neural network classifier is expressed in terms of risk [37], defined as the probability of misclassification of a given image, weighted with respect to the input distribution µ of images.”
- On the Safety of Machine Learning: Cyber-Physical Systems, Decision Sciences, and Data Products (2016, background): “The first contribution of this work is to critically examine the foundational statist ical machine learning principles of empirical risk minimizatio n and structural risk minimization [5] from the perspective o f safety.”
- Invariant Risk Minimization (2019, background): “This is the ubiquitous Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) principle [50].”
- On Learning to Think: Algorithmic Information Theory for Novel Combinations of Reinforcement Learning Controllers and Recurrent Neural World Models (2015, background): “2 M ’s Training To decrease bitsM + bitsH , we add a regularizing term to E, to punish excessive complexity [4, 5, 91, 294, 155, 135, 97, 170, 169, 104, 290, 7, 290, 87, 286, 319, 100, 102].”
- Optimal Ordered Problem Solver (2002, neutral): “Other primitives may include various traditional AI path planners (Russell & Norvig, 1994), artificial neural networks (Werbos, 1974; Rumelhart, Hinton, & Williams, 1986; Bishop, 1995) or support vector machines (Vapnik, 1992) for classifying sensory data written into temporary internal storage, as ”
- Generalizing from a Few Examples (2019, background): “is usually used as a proxy for R(h), leading to empirical risk minimization [94, 136] (with possibly some regularizers).”
- Comparing human-centric and robot-centric sampling for robot deep learning from demonstrations (2016, methodology): “However, this could require more data than HC methods [23].”
- Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalization (2019, methodology): “Here, we show that we can improve performance by directly optimizing for an estimated upper bound on the robust test loss, using ideas from structural risk minimization (Vapnik, 1992).”
- Engineering safety in machine learning (2016, background): “The first contribution of this work is to critically examine the foundational statist ical machine learning principles of empirical risk minimizatio n and structural risk minimization [4] from the perspective o f safety.”
- Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey (2021, methodology): “For a given dataset Dtr ain , ERM tries to find the parameters θ∗ that minimize the following objective function: minRDtr ain (θ ) = 1 N N∑ n=1 L(y(n), f (x (n);θ )), (1) where L(·, ·) is a loss function.”
- Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx) (2020, methodology): “…simply minimizes the average loss across all training examples, regardless of environment: Empirical risk minimization has strong theoretical foundations in the case of i.i.d. data (Vapnik, 1992), and often works well in practice, outperforming more sophisticated methods (Chen et al., 2019).”
- Distributionally Robust Neural Networks (2020, methodology): “Here, we show that we can improve performance by directly optimizing for an estimated upper bound on the robust test loss, using ideas from structural risk minimization (Vapnik, 1992).”