Strengthening mechanisms in directed energy deposited austenitic stainless steel

By Thale R. Smith, J. Sugar, C. San Marchi, J. Schoenung. Acta Materialia, 2019

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Microstructures and mechanical properties are evaluated in austenitic stainless steel structures fabricated by directed energy deposition (DED) considering the effects of applied loading orientation, build geometry, and distance from the deposition baseplate. Locations within an as-deposited build with different thermomechanical history display different yield strength, while those locations with similar history have approximately the same yield strength, regardless of test specimen orientation. Thermal expansion of deposited material near the baseplate is inhibited by the mechanical constraint imposed by the baseplate, promoting plastic deformation and producing a high density of dislocations. Concurrently, high initial cooling rates decrease away from the baseplate as the build is heated, causing an increased spacing of cellular solidification features. An analysis of strengthening mechanisms quantitatively established for the first time the important strengthening contribution of high dislocation densities in the materials (166–191 MPa) to yield strength that ranged from 438 to 553 MPa in the present DED fabricated structures. A newly adopted mechanistic relationship for microsegregation strengthening from the literature indicated an additional important contribution to strengthening (123–135 MPa) due to the cellular solidification features. These findings are corroborated by the measured evolution of microstructure and hardness caused by annealing the DED material. These results suggest that the mechanical properties of deposited austenitic stainless steels can be influenced by controlling thermomechanical history during the manufacturing process to alter the character of compositional microsegregation and the amount of induced plastic deformation.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/963b8b7e3851c4ca731b0f7ab0bd5c70d1ba3797

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

  1. D. Qiu
  2. D. StJohn
  3. M. Easton
  4. M. Qian
  5. C. J. Todaro
  6. Milan Brandt
  7. Zhiming Li
  8. U. Ramamurty

In Mechanical Engineering

  1. D. Qiu
  2. M. Qian
  3. M. Easton
  4. D. StJohn
  5. C. J. Todaro
  6. Milan Brandt
  7. Jun Wei
  8. Zhiming Li

Citations in the corpus