Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking

By Piotr Błaszczyk, Mikhail G. Katz, David Sherry. 2012

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The widespread idea that infinitesimals were “eliminated” by the “great triumvirate” of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass is refuted by an uninterrupted chain of work on infinitesimal-enriched number systems. The elimination claim is an oversimplification created by triumvirate followers, who tend to view the history of analysis as a pre-ordained march toward the radiant future of Weierstrassian epsilontics. In the present text, we document distortions of the history of analysis stemming from the triumvirate ideology of ontological minimalism, which identified the continuum with a single number system. Such anachronistic distortions characterize the received interpretation of Stevin, Leibniz, d’Alembert, Cauchy, and others.

Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science, Mathematical Physics, Theoretical Computer Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96380791419776556fee2d6aab11a06e2c968228

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History and Philosophy of Science

  1. David Sherry
  2. Mikhail G. Katz
  3. Piotr Błaszczyk
  4. J. McGrane

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Mikhail G. Katz
  2. David Sherry
  3. Piotr Błaszczyk

In Theoretical Computer Science

  1. Mikhail G. Katz
  2. David Sherry
  3. Piotr Błaszczyk
  4. R. Ely

Citations in the corpus