Does mobility explain variation in colonisation and population recovery among stream fishes

By Brett Albanese, P. Angermeier, J. Peterson. 2009

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/962f236f8c730f4bba14fe4fa3d6ed60a27f4e7e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. García‐Berthou
2. S. Tomanova
3. C. Vaughn
4. D. Spooner
5. P. Leunda

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. E. García‐Berthou
2. S. Tomanova
3. C. Vaughn
4. P. Leunda
5. D. Spooner
6. David L. Strayer

Citations in the corpus

• Comparing fish assemblages and trophic ecology of permanent and intermittent reaches in a Mediterranean stream (2010, background): “Fish population recovery depends on the rate and extent of recolonisation from refugia upon rewetting, the distance from refugia, and the species-specific behaviour (Magoulick & Kobza, 2003; Davey & Kelly, 2007; Albanese et al., 2009).”
• Life history traits and abundance can predict local colonisation and extinction rates of freshwater mussels (2012, background): “Albanese et al. (2009) found that fish species with low mobility recover more slowly following local extinctions.”