In Disguise or Out of Reach: First Clues about In Situ and Accreted Stars in the Stellar Halo of the Milky Way from Gaia DR2

By M. Haywood, Paola Di Matteo, M. Lehnert, O. Snaith, S. Khoperskov, Ana G'omez. Astrophysical Journal, 2018

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate the nature of the double color–magnitude sequence observed in the Gaia DR2 HR diagram of stars with high transverse velocities. The stars in the reddest-color sequence are likely dominated by the dynamically hot tail of the thick disk population. Information from Nissen & Schuster and from the APOGEE survey suggests that stars in the blue-color sequence have elemental abundance patterns that can be explained by this population having a relatively low star formation efficiency during its formation. In dynamical and orbital spaces, such as the “Toomre diagram,” the two sequences show a significant overlap, but with a tendency for stars on the blue-color sequence to dominate regions with no or retrograde rotation and high total orbital energy. In the plane defined by the maximal vertical excursion of the orbits versus their apocenters, stars of both sequences redistribute into discrete wedges. We conclude that stars that are typically assigned to the halo in the solar vicinity are actually both accreted stars lying along the blue sequence in the HR diagram, and the low rotational velocity tail of the old Galactic disk, possibly dynamically heated by past accretion events. Our results imply that a halo population formed in situ and responsible for the early chemical enrichment prior to the formation of the thick disk has yet to be robustly identified, and that what has been defined as the stars of the in situ stellar halo of the Galaxy may in fact be fossil records of its last significant merger.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9629c0c7ba694dedf4802d8f680e57455e94b58e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. V. Belokurov
  2. N. Evans II
  3. Eugene O. Vasiliev
  4. Sergey E. Koposov
  5. J. Sanders
  6. A. Deason
  7. R. Grand
  8. Azadeh Fattahi

In Instrumentation

  1. Eugene O. Vasiliev
  2. V. Belokurov
  3. N. Evans II
  4. Sergey E. Koposov
  5. A. Deason
  6. J. Sanders
  7. Martin C. Smith
  8. Azadeh Fattahi

Citations in the corpus