Non-target screening with high-resolution mass spectrometry: critical review using a collaborative trial on water analysis

By Emma L. Schymanski, H. Singer, J. Slobodnik, I. Ipolyi, P. Oswald, M. Krauss, Tobias Schulze, P. Haglund, T. Letzel, S. Grosse and 18 more. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2015

588 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96279f28f29c8d8b31ea06bffd1902668afba73f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Steffen Neumann
2. Antony J. Williams

In Molecular Biology

1. Steffen Neumann
2. Sebastian Wolf
3. Emma L. Schymanski
4. Christoph Ruttkies
5. Juliane Hollender
6. Antony J. Williams
7. David Broadhurst
8. Douglas B. Kell

In Spectroscopy

1. Steffen Neumann
2. Richard S. Judson
3. Christopher M. Grulke
4. Kamel Mansouri
5. Antony J. Williams
6. Douglas B. Kell
7. David Broadhurst

Citations in the corpus

• MetFrag relaunched: incorporating strategies beyond in silico fragmentation (2016, background): “Suspect screening approaches, growing in popularity in environmental analysis [1], were also incorporated to allow users to screen large databases (i.”
• The CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a community data resource for environmental chemistry (2017, background): “The use of NTA is increasingly being employed in environmental research to gather information on the realworld exposures to a broad range of chemicals potentially present in media such as wastewater [138], water [124, 139], dust [123], sediment and others.”