The conflict between traditional and scientific forest management in 20th century Finland

By H. Siiskonen. 2007

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Optimizing the structure and management of uneven-sized stands of Finland (2010, background): “On the contrary, uneven-sized management has even been banned in Finland since the 1950s (Siiskonen, 2007) even though uneven-sized stands have been found to have higher volume increments than even-sized stands (Lähde et al.”
Continuous Cover Forestry (2012, background): “For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/6247 Timo Pukkala Klaus von Gadow Editors Continuous Cover Forestry Second Edition 123 Editors Timo Pukkala University of Eastern Finland School of Forest Sciences Yliopistokatu 7 80100 Joensuu Finland timo.pukkala@uef.fi Klaus von Gadow Georg-Augu”
OPTIMAL CHOICE BETWEEN EVEN‐ AND UNEVEN‐AGED FORESTRY (2008, background): “Some studies on the Faustmann model and its extensions (Tahvonen et al. [2001], Tahvonen and Kallio [2006]) have shown that capital market imperfections and stochastic timber price imply that the optimal rotation is determined as if forest owners had a higher rate of discount.”
Natural forest dynamics in boreal Fennoscandia: a review and classification (2011, result): “This point of view was not surprising, considering that after WWII forestry in Fennoscandia switched to using clearcutting as the dominant harvesting method, in contrast to previously practised selective cuttings (Siiskonen 2007).”