Assessing Spatial Equity and Efficiency Impacts of Transport Infrastructure Projects

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What Can Be Learned from Spatial Economics? (2019, unknown): “To conduct the cost–benefit analysis, Proost et al. rely on the spatial general equilibrium model of Bröcker, Korzhenevych, and Schürmann (2010).”
Discussing Equity and Social Exclusion in Accessibility Evaluations (2011, background): “…2006), the distribution effects of public transport policies (e.g. Bureau and Glachant, 2011), the spatial equity of transport infrastructure projects (e.g. Bröcker et al., 2010; de Almeida et al., 2010) and the differences in accessibility between transport modes (e.g. Kawabat and Shen, 2007).”
The impacts of high-speed rail extensions on accessibility and spatial equity changes in South Korea from 2004 to 2018 (2015, background): “The inclusion of efficiency and equity effects is increasing in demand by policy makers for any large-scale transportation investment such as the HSR (Bröcker et al., 2010, Monzón et al., 2013, Perl and Goetz, 2015), suggesting that South Korean HSR should be further evaluated.”
Efficiency and spatial equity impacts of high-speed rail extensions in urban areas (2013, methodology): “It is therefore increasingly being claimed that the design of a HSR network may need to be modified to ensure that both an acceptable degree of equity is retained, while maximizing economic growth (Bröcker et al., 2010; Button, 1993; López & Monzón, 2010).”