The perception of prosodic prominence
By J. Terken, D. Hermes. 2000
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/960ca4e201b552999c7e2a154b9f8a099bf458ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jörg Tiedemann
- Aniruddh D. Patel
- Martti Vainio
- Hubert Truckenbrodt
- Sofoklis Kakouros
- Antti Suni
- H. Çelikkanat
- Aarne Talman
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Signal Processing
Citations in the corpus
- Predicting Prosodic Prominence from Text with Pre-trained Contextualized Word Representations (2019, background): “henomenon that manifests through the subjective impression of emphasis in speech where certain words are interpreted as more salient within their lexical surrounding context (Wagner and Watson, 2010; Terken and Hermes, 2000). Due to the inherent difficulty in determining prominence — even for human s”
- Musical Rhythm, Linguistic Rhythm, and Human Evolution (2006, background): “Interestingly, speech also has a “metrical” hierarchy based on stress or prominence (Selkirk, 1984; Terken & Hermes, 2000), suggesting that a tendency to organize rhythmic sequences in terms of hierarchical prominence patterns may originate in language.”
- Upstep and embedded register levels (2002, background): “…1995, Xu 1998, Arvaniti et al. 2000, Ladd et al. 2000; see also Myers 1999) and investigations of the perception of peak prominence and}or declination (Terken 1991, 1993, Terken & Hermes 2000, Ladd 1993a, Ladd et al. 1994, Ladd & Morton 1997, Gussenhoven et al. 1997, Gussenhoven & Rietveld 1998).”