GJI Geomagnetism, rock magnetism and palaeomagnetism GRIMM: the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model based on vector satellite and observatory data

By V. Lesur, I. Wardinski, Martin K. A. Rother, Mioara Mandea. 2008

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54e3295dd49c92d51efb677ad248da9d3ac57d2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. G. Hulot
2. E. Thébault
3. M. Purucker
4. B. Langlais
5. S. Maus
6. K. Whaler
7. Hermann Lühr
8. Catherine Constable

Citations in the corpus

• Resolution of direction of oceanic magnetic lineations by the sixth‐generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite magnetic measurements (2008, background): “[12] It has been recognized for some time that unfiltered field models, such as CM4 [Sabaka et al., 2004], GRIMM [Lesur et al., 2008], CHAOS [Olsen et al., 2006] and POMME-4 (http://geomag. org/models/pomme4.html) have higher power levels than the MF series of models.”
• Rotating convective turbulence in Earth and planetary cores (2015, unknown): “To test the various mechanisms hypothesized for generating large-scale magnetic flux patches in Earth’s core, we first need advanced models of the field itself (e.g., Lesur et al., 2008; Korte and Holme, 2010; Finlay et al., 2012).”
• The Magnetic Field of Planet Earth (2010, methodology): “Several core field models derived from Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C satellites data have recently been published, for which the first time derivative is now determined up to perhaps degree l = 14–16 (e.g. Maus et al. 2006; Lesur et al. 2008; Olsen et al. 2009a).”
• The CHAOS-4 Geomagnetic Field Model (2013, methodology): “Examples of models derived using this approach are the CM models (e.g. Sabaka et al. 2004), and, using more recent satellite data, the GRIMM models (Lesur et al. 2008; Lesur et al. 2010, 2013), the BGS models (Thomson & Lesur 2007; Thomson et al. 2010), and the CHAOS models (Olsen et al. 2006,…”
• The Magnetic Field of the Earth’s Lithosphere (2010, methodology): “The CHAOS (Olsen et al. 2006) and CHAOS-2 (Olsen et al. 2009a) models, and GRIMM (Lesur et al. 2008), for instance, propose different ways of modelling the main field, its secular variation and acceleration for the past 10 years (2000–2010) but do not resolve the lithospheric field better than SH de”