Response Latency Methodology for Survey Research: Measurement and Modeling Strategies

By K. Mulligan, J. Grant, Stephen T. Mockabee, J. Q. Monson. Political Analysis, 2003

78 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95fa240df6038f0a697b32cbfa57feb7d0901ec3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Cameron Roche
2. Brian F. Schaffner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Cameron Roche
2. Brian F. Schaffner

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. Cameron Roche
2. Brian F. Schaffner

Citations in the corpus

• Misinformation and Motivated ReasoningResponses to Economic News in a Politicized Environment (2016, methodology): “To gain more insight into how respondents approach their responses to survey questions, previous studies have made use of response latency measures (Mulligan et al., 2003).”
• Theoretical and Empirical Implications of Attitude Strength (2004, unknown): “The only study that has looked for these differences (Mulligan et al. 2003) found no systematic difference between latent and active timers.”