Thickness of the Martian crust: Improved constraints from geoid-to-topography ratios
By Mark A. Wieczorek, Maria T. Zuber. 2004
246 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95f6d848a0e0d4e3ce1a70c1ea9787929486685c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- F. Nimmo
- Jeffrey Taylor
- Mark A. Wieczorek
- Maria T. Zuber
- V. Belléguic
- William M. Folkner
- S. Squyres
- S. Smrekar
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Mark A. Wieczorek
- Maria T. Zuber
- F. Nimmo
- Shijie Zhong
- J. Roberts
- G. Neumann
- F. LeMoine
- Philippe Lognonné
Citations in the corpus
- Mars high resolution gravity fields from MRO, Mars seasonal gravity, and other dynamical parameters (2011, background): “For example, if we fix DT = 200K and crustal thickness to 50 km (cf. Zuber et al., 2000; Nimmo, 2002; Wieczorek and Zuber, 2004), then the allowed range in vM which satisfies both constraints is only about 84–86%.”
- The composition of Mars (2019, background): “The average crustal thickness of 50 km, which is consistent with geophysical and geochemical constraints (Zuber et al., 2000; McGovern et al., 2002, 2004; Wieczorek and Zuber, 2004; Ruiz et al., 2009), is adopted in the modeling.”
- Bulk composition and early differentiation of Mars (2007, background): “If the crust is 57 km thick, as inferred from geophysical studies [e.g., Wieczorek and Zuber, 2004 ], then 50% of the bulk Th is in the crust.”
- The bulk composition of Mars (2013, background): “Since the crust averges 57 km thick (Wieczorek and Zuber, 2004), making up about .6 wt% of bulk silicate Mars, its mean Cl content should be around 50 ppm. GRS and MER data show that the average surface Cl conentration is about 5000 ppm.”
- EARLY CRUSTAL EVOLUTION OF MARS 1 (2005, methodology): “Wieczorek & Zuber (2004) showed that this approach introduces errors, and they derived a mean crustal thickness for the southern highlands of 57 ± 24 km. Crustal thicknesses have also been estimated using geochemical data (see Chemical Characteristics, below).”
- Degree-1 convection in the Martian mantle and the origin of the hemispheric dichotomy (2006, background): “However, Zhong and Zuber [2001] considered a low value for activation volume relative to what the Earth’s mantle is expected to have [Karato and Jung, 2003].”
- Enceladus's and Dione's floating ice shells supported by minimum stress isostasy (2016, background): “Finally, isostasy plays a crucial role in understanding the long-wavelength gravity and shape as well as estimating the crust thickness of the planets Mars [Wieczorek and Zuber, 2004], Venus [James et al., 2013], and Mercury [Perry et al., 2015].”
- Crustal structure of Mars from gravity and topography (2004, methodology): “Wieczorek and Zuber [2004] advocate a plausible range of bulk crustal densities from 2700 to 3100 kg m� 3. Following many authors, we adopt 2900 kg m� 3 as a Bouguer reduction density.”
- Constraints on the Martian lithosphere from gravity and topography data and implication for volcanism and possible mantle heterogeneities (2005, background): “Assuming an average crustal thickness between 38 and 62 km [ Wieczorek and Zuber, 2004 ], the 6 km dierence in elevation between the Northern lowlands and Southern highlands would correspond to a dierence in density between 310 and 520 kg m 3. Though slightly on the high side, this number is roughly”
- Experimental petrology of the basaltic shergottite Yamato‐980459: Implications for the thermal structure of the Martian mantle (2006, result): “In these models, the crust is assumed to be 53 km in thickness (the top four rows of the finite element grid), consistent with the results of Wieczorek and Zuber (2004).”
- Heterogeneous distribution of H2O in the Martian interior: Implications for the abundance of H2O in depleted and enriched mantle sources (2016, methodology): “In order to compute the estimates, we use (1) a crustal thickness estimate of 57 km (Wieczorek and Zuber 2004), (2) a core radius of 1680 km (Taylor 2013), (3) an average crustal density of 2900 kg m 3 (Neumann et al. 2004), and an average mantle density of 3400 kg m 3 (Bertka and Fei 1997).”