Efficient iterative policy optimization
By Nicolas Le Roux. 2016
8 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We tackle the issue of finding a good policy when the number of policy updates is limited. This is done by approximating the expected policy reward as a sequence of concave lower bounds which can be efficiently maximized, drastically reducing the number of policy updates required to achieve good performance. We also extend existing methods to negative rewards, enabling the use of control variates.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Shixiang Shane Gu
- Ofir Nachum
- Chelsea Finn
- Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yoshua Bengio
In Computer Networks and Communications
- R´emi Munos
- Jost Tobias Springenberg
- Yuval Tassa
- Abbas Abdolmaleki
- Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess
- Martin A. Riedmiller
- Yutaka Matsuo
- Ofir Nachum
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Shixiang Shane Gu
- Sergey Levine
- Ofir Nachum
- Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess
- Martin A. Riedmiller
- Jost Tobias Springenberg
- Abbas Abdolmaleki
- Yuval Tassa
Citations in the corpus
- Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisation (2018, methodology): “An interesting recent addition to these approaches is an EM-perspective on the PoWER algorithm (Roux, 2016) which uses the same iterative policy improvement employed here, but commits to parametric inference distributions and avoids an exponential reward transformation, resulting in a harder to opti”
- Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Model-Based Offline Optimization (2020, background): “One may consider previously proposed semi-batch RL algorithms (Ernst et al., 2005; Lange et al., 2012; Singh et al., 1994; Roux, 2016) or theoretical analysis of switching cost under the tabular PAC-MDP settings (Bai et al., 2019; Guo & Brunskill, 2015) as approaching this issue.”