Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates

By Chuang Zhao, Bing Liu, Shilong Piao, Xuhui Wang, David B. Lobell, Yao Huang, Mengtian Huang, Yitong Yao, Simona Bassu, Philippe Ciais and 19 more. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017

2,617 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Significance Agricultural production is vulnerable to climate change. Understanding climate change, especially the temperature impacts, is critical if policymakers, agriculturalists, and crop breeders are to ensure global food security. Our study, by compiling extensive published results from four analytical methods, shows that independent methods consistently estimated negative temperature impacts on yields of four major crops at the global scale, generally underpinned by similar impacts at country and site scales. Multimethod analyses improved the confidence in assessments of future climate impacts on global major crops, with important implications for developing crop- and region-specific adaptation strategies to ensure future food supply of an increasing world population. Wheat, rice, maize, and soybean provide two-thirds of human caloric intake. Assessing the impact of global temperature increase on production of these crops is therefore critical to maintaining global food supply, but different studies have yielded different results. Here, we investigated the impacts of temperature on yields of the four crops by compiling extensive published results from four analytical methods: global grid-based and local point-based models, statistical regressions, and field-warming experiments. Results from the different methods consistently showed negative temperature impacts on crop yield at the global scale, generally underpinned by similar impacts at country and site scales. Without CO2 fertilization, effective adaptation, and genetic improvement, each degree-Celsius increase in global mean temperature would, on average, reduce global yields of wheat by 6.0%, rice by 3.2%, maize by 7.4%, and soybean by 3.1%. Results are highly heterogeneous across crops and geographical areas, with some positive impact estimates. Multimethod analyses improved the confidence in assessments of future climate impacts on global major crops and suggest crop- and region-specific adaptation strategies to ensure food security for an increasing world population.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95d3e166ce9d57f72fe5eedf5df76d23e1484a70

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. L. Rosa
  2. Paolo D'Odorico
  3. Maria Cristina Rulli
  4. Alexander V. Prishchepov
  5. J. Dell’Angelo
  6. J. Carr
  7. Samir Suweis
  8. D. Ray

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. L. Rosa
  2. Paolo D'Odorico
  3. Paul C. West
  4. D. Ray
  5. Samir Suweis
  6. Terence P. Dawson
  7. James Gerber
  8. Nathan G. McDowell

In Plant Science

  1. Paolo D'Odorico
  2. Thomas N. Buckley
  3. A. Qi
  4. B. Richard
  5. D. Ray
  6. L. Rosa
  7. Pete Smith
  8. James Gerber

Citations in the corpus