Trade and Empire

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Globalization and the Great Divergence: terms of trade booms, volatility and the poor periphery, 1782–1913 (2008, background): “2003), a commitment to the gold standard (Meissner 2005) and perhaps even imperialism itself (Ferguson 2004; Mitchener and Weidenmier 2007) all made additional contributions to the world trade boom.”
The Wind of Change: Maritime Technology, Trade and Economic Development (2017, background): “All of these datasets begin after 1870, and with respect to Mitchener and Weidenmier (2008), these datasets cover a much smaller number of dyads and are overwhelmingly drawn from intra-European trade during the nineteenth century.”
Trade Booms, Trade Busts, and Trade Costs (2011, background): “…true no matter what supply-side considerations give rise to specialization, be they increasing returns to scale in a world of differentiated products, technology differences in a world of Ricardian trade, large factor 8 As a second step, we exploit the fact that these trade models predict similar…”