Applying SAT Methods in Unbounded Symbolic Model Checking
By Kenneth L. McMillan. International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, 2002
401 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95d2b335b775941d2e8df0ee02e3496da3f83f14
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Aaron R. Bradley
- Sanjit A. Seshia
- Clark W. Barrett
- Cesare Tinelli
- Roberto Sebastiani
- Edmund M. Clarke
- Paolo Zuliani
- Armin Biere
In Software
- Aaron R. Bradley
- Cesare Tinelli
- Sanjit A. Seshia
- Roberto Sebastiani
- Edmund M. Clarke
- Clark W. Barrett
- Paolo Zuliani
- Armin Biere
Citations in the corpus
- Handbook of Satisfiability (2021, background): “In SAT, the problem of finding small unsatisfiable cores has been addressed by many authors in recent years [95, 103, 159, 116, 82, 58, 29, 74, 156] due to its importance in formal verification [100].”
- Resolve and Expand (2004, background): “Another general bottom-up approach [16,14,15,6] is also based on quantifier elimination.”
- Model Checking and the State Explosion Problem (2011, methodology): “Other techniques for making BMC complete are cube enlargement [18], circuit co-factoring [14], and Craig interpolants [19].”
- Bounded model checking (2003, methodology): “McMillan [21] recently introduced a SAT-based unboundedCTL model checker.”
- SAT-Based Model Checking without Unrolling (2011, methodology): “SAT-based unbounded model checking constructs clauses via quantifier elimination; for a safety property P , it computes the weakest inductive strengthening of P [20].”