Stage‐structured harvesting and its effects: an empirical investigation using soil mites

By T. Cameron, T. Benton. 2004

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Immunology and Allergy, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95cd7ab40cee8f408f403123494173cb0a41aa2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Joseph Mendelson

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. B. Shuter
2. Clifford E. Kraft
3. Evan G. Cooch
4. Elise F. Zipkin
5. James P. Collins
6. P. Sullivan
7. B. Weidel

Citations in the corpus

• Overcompensatory response of a smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) population to harvest: release from competition? (2008, background): “However, harvest can lead to unexpected dynamics such as increases in abundance of targeted populations, as has been reported for both plant (Paige 1992; Buckley et al. 2001; Newingham and Callaway 2006) and insect (Nicholson 1957; Cameron and Benton 2004) populations.”
• The theta‐logistic is unreliable for modelling most census data (2010, unknown): “…(Beverton & Holt 1957) and theta-logistic models, which collectively are used often in applied ecology to estimate maximum sustainable yield targets (Cameron & Benton 2004), temporal abundance patterns (Sæther, Engen & Matthysen 2002), the most effective wildlife management interventions…”
• Amphibian Conservation Action Plan (2007, background): “, 2003), and the life stage or age of individuals collected (Cameron and Benton, 2004).”