A cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth in quasibrittle materials

By Bo-Syung Yang, S. Mall, K. Ravi-Chandar. 2001

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95c000923d0bec55614da80cbf6717c5424a5a5a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

A fatigue degradation law for cohesive interface elements – Development and application to composite materials (2010, background): “Whilst formulations have been developed to account for damage under cyclic loading [20,21,22,23,24], these tend to”
Numerical simulation of fatigue‐driven delamination using interface elements (2005, methodology): “The use of interface elements for the analysis of interlaminar fracture in composite structures has been widely proposed in the literature [4–9].”
Methods for the prediction of fatigue delamination growth in composites and adhesive bonds: A critical review (2013, background): “[177] formulated a damage parameter such that damage was also accrued during the unloading portion of the load cycle.”
A cohesive model for fatigue failure of polymers (2005, methodology): “Finally, fatigue crack growth in quasi-brittle materials has also been studied by cohesive techniques in [24], where the irreversibility of the loading and unloading paths is taken into account.”
A crack tip tracking algorithm for cohesive interface element analysis of fatigue delamination propagation in composite materials (2012, methodology): “More recently the CZM approach has been further developed to model fatigue crack growth (Nguyen et al., 2001; Yang et al., 2001) and delamination propagation in composites under fatigue loading (Robinson et al.”
Analysis of crack growth and crack-tip plasticity in ductile materials using cohesive zone models (2003, methodology): “They have been used to simulate fracture under static (Needleman, 1990a,b; Xu and Needleman, 1993; Tvergaard and Hutchinson, 1992, 1994, 1996), dynamic (Camacho and Ortiz, 1996; Xu and Needleman, 1994; Siegmund and Needleman, 1997; Siegmund et al., 1997), cyclic ( Yang et al., 2001 ), and impact loa”