The potential of temporary migration programmes in future international migration policy

By M. Ruhs. 2006

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95a5535978a0ab32b18570020f2dc73ad245106c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Hein de Haas
2. P. Wickramasekara
3. Graeme Hugo
4. K. Preibisch
5. Philip Martin
6. J. Hennebry
7. John Gibson
8. David J. McKenzie

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Hein de Haas
2. John Gibson
3. David J. McKenzie
4. P. Wickramasekara
5. Graeme Hugo
6. K. Preibisch
7. J. Hennebry
8. Philip Martin

Citations in the corpus

• Turning the tide? Why development will not stop migration. (2007, background): “Temporary migration is therefore sometimes believed to create a ‘win-win-win’ situation from which both migrants, receiving and sending states would benefit (cf. Ruhs, 2005:20).”
• A Model for Managed Migration? Re-Examining Best Practices in Canada’s Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (2012, background): “…development rationale: receiving countries may benefit from the increased supply of labour and human capital, sending countries may benefit from remittances and the return of more highly skilled workers, and migrants may benefit from the opportunity to increase productivity and wages (Ruhs, 2003).”
• Which Skilled Temporary Migrants Become Permanent Residents and Why? 1 (2008, background): “It allows for the links and hypotheses between temporary and permanent migration to be tested in conditions that are relatively free from the pressures for permanent settlement that normally arise from low-skilled migrant worker programs elsewhere (Ruhs, 2005:18–19).”
• The Development Impact of a Best Practice Seasonal Worker Policy (2010, background): “…26, 2006, http://www.islandsbusiness.com /news/index_dynamic/containerNameToReplace=MiddleMiddle/focus ModuleID=130/focusContentID=6691/tableName=mediaRelease/overide SkinName=newsArticle-full.tpl. 2 These concerns are discussed in Ruhs (2006), Pritchett (2006), and OECD (2008), among others.”
• Circular Migration: A Triple Win or a Dead End (2011, background): “Some are more general discussions of temporary worker programmes (Abella 2006; Ruhs 2006; Martin 2007; 2010).”
• How Valuable is “Two-Step Migration”? Labor Market Outcomes for International Student Migrants to Australia (2010, unknown): “…a socially ”palatable” source of migration – e.g., in Germany and the Netherlands, where few former guest workers or their descendants have the educational base to meet knowledge economy requirements (Castles, 2006; Ruhs, 2006; OECD, 2007; Roodenburg et al., 2003; Helle and Sauer, 2007).”
• Numbers vs. Rights: Trade-Offs and Guest Worker Programs 1 (2008, background): “In contrast, the right to work in the “flexible” labor markets of the UK and Ireland was accompanied by restrictions on migrants’ access to unemployment and welfare benefits ( see National Economic and Social Council of Ireland, 2006a; Ruhs, 2006b).”
• Guestworkers in Europe: A Resurrection? (2006, unknown): “However: “To achieve these net-benefits in practice will almost certainly require a high degree of government involvement and intervention in the labor market” (Ruhs, 2005).”