The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Comparing Review
By Nikolaus Hansen. 2006
2,322 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
- Patrick Siarry
- Philip Thomas
- Holger H. Hoos
- M. Stone
- Agoston E. Eiben
- Balázs Kégl
- Peter Stone
- Nikolaos V. Sahinidis
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Patrick Siarry
- Philip Thomas
- Holger H. Hoos
- M. Stone
- Agoston E. Eiben
- Balázs Kégl
- Peter Stone
- Nikolaos V. Sahinidis
In Genetics
- Patrick Siarry
- Philip Thomas
- Holger H. Hoos
- M. Stone
- Agoston E. Eiben
- Balázs Kégl
- Peter Stone
- Nikolaos V. Sahinidis
Citations in the corpus
- On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithms (2018, methodology): “Initially, we tried optimizing the Reptile hyper-parameters using CMA-ES [6].”
- Fast Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Hyperparameters on Large Datasets (2016, methodology): “To maximize the acquisition function we used the blackbox optimizer DIRECT (Jones, 2001) and CMAES (Hansen, 2006).”
- One Pixel Attack for Fooling Deep Neural Networks (2017, methodology): “As the tradeoff of being a low-cost, easy-implemented L0 attack, we do not expect one pixel attack can achieve significantly better robustness against such detection methods compared to other L0 attacks such as [32].”
- Stein Variational Policy Gradient (2017, methodology): “Instead of computing the finite difference for each individual parameter, rollout efficient methods such as SPSA (Spall, 1998), PEPG (Sehnke et al., 2010) and evolutionary strategy approximations (Hansen, 2006, Mannor et al., 2003) have been proposed.”
- Safe Reinforcement Learning (2015, methodology): “In all of the experiments in this dissertation, we solve (approximately) for this global maximum using the black-box optimization algorithm covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES) (Hansen, 2006).”
- A Surrogate-Assisted Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Computationally Expensive Many-Objective Optimization (2018, methodology): “For instance, MOEA/D-EGO uses differential evolution [44] and SMS-EGO employs covariance matrix adaptation [19] to optimize the hyperparameters,”
- A Survey of Automatic Parameter Tuning Methods for Metaheuristics (2020, methodology): “In parameter control, self-adaptive parameter control, such as step-size control and covariance matrix adaptation in covariance matrix adaptation ES (CMA-ES) [23], is the state-of-the-art method for numerical parameter control.”
- Terrain-adaptive bipedal locomotion control (2010, methodology): “We use the CMA evolution strategy as a black-box optimizer [Hansen 2006].”
- Surrogating the surrogate: accelerating Gaussian-process-based global optimization with a mixture cross-entropy algorithm (2010, methodology): “This is similar to CMA-ES ( Hansen, 2006), another efficient search heuristics based on the evolutionary update of a single Gaussian.”
- Automated Algorithm Configuration and Parameter Tuning (2012, methodology): “These meth- ods range from well-known numerical optimisation procedures, such as the NelderMead Simplex algorithm (Nelder and Mead, 1965; Bűrmen et al, 2006) or the more recent, gradient-free CMA-ES algorithm (Hansen, 2006; Hansen and Ostermeier, 2001; Hansen and Kern, 2004), to approaches based on”
- Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications (2014, methodology): “RAS minimizes the KL-divergence with respect to the distribution in the current iteration, called the reference model. Covariance Matrix Adaptation–Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES). In the CMAES algorithm [81], new samples are obtained from a multivariate normal distribution, and inter-variable dependenc”
- Quantum annealing for industry applications: introduction and review (2021, neutral): “They used the covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy [75] to heuristically optimize the annealing offset of the qubit chains, i.e., the Δ t of advance or delay for each qubit in physical time.”
- Differentiable Expected Hypervolume Improvement for Parallel Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization (2020, methodology): “If not, gradients are either approximated (e.g. with finite differences) or gradient-free methods (e.g. DIRECT [36] or CMA-ES [31]) are used.”