Errors in Idea Evaluation: Preference for the Unoriginal?

By Cassie S. Blair, Michael D. Mumford. 2007

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/959bbe870858e1622ae86576f06a0ce500abf34c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. B. Nijstad
2. Selcuk Acar
3. Eric Rietzschel
4. Wolfgang Stroebe
5. Mark A. Runco

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Eric Rietzschel
2. B. Nijstad
3. Wolfgang Stroebe
4. Selcuk Acar
5. Mark A. Runco
6. V. Glăveanu
7. Paul J Silvia
8. Barry L. Bayus

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of Problem Scope and Creativity Instructions on Idea Generation and Selection (2014, result): “In line with these results, Mueller, Melwani, and Goncalo (2012) recently reported evidence for an implicit bias against creativity (and in favor of practicality) under conditions of uncertainty (also see Blair & Mumford, 2007).”
• Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential (2012, background): “Blair and Mumford (2007) focused their research on the attributes of ideas that are taken into account when evaluating.”