THE FMOS-COSMOS SURVEY OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z ∼ 1.6. I. Hα-BASED STAR FORMATION RATES AND DUST EXTINCTION

By D. Kashino, J. Silverman, G. Rodighiero, A. Renzini, N. Arimoto, E. Daddi, S. Lilly, D. Sanders, J. Kartaltepe, H. Zahid and 19 more. 2013

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the first results from a near-IR spectroscopic survey of the COSMOS field, using the Fiber Multi-Object Spectrograph on the Subaru telescope, designed to characterize the star-forming galaxy population at 1.4 < z < 1.7. The high-resolution mode is implemented to detect Hα in emission between 1.6–1.8 μm with fHα ≳ 4 × 10−17 erg cm−2 s−1. Here, we specifically focus on 271 sBzK-selected galaxies that yield a Hα detection thus providing a redshift and emission line luminosity to establish the relation between star formation rate and stellar mass. With further J-band spectroscopy for 89 of these, the level of dust extinction is assessed by measuring the Balmer decrement using co-added spectra. We find that the extinction (0.6 ≲ AHα ≲ 2.5) rises with stellar mass and is elevated at high masses compared to low-redshift galaxies. Using this subset of the spectroscopic sample, we further find that the differential extinction between stellar and nebular emission Estar(B − V)/Eneb(B − V) is 0.7–0.8, dissimilar to that typically seen at low redshift. After correcting for extinction, we derive an Hα-based main sequence with a slope (0.81 ± 0.04) and normalization similar to previous studies at these redshifts.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95992404229293268c856d99c63ef5964d99cb6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. P. V. van Dokkum
  4. D. M. Alexander
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. A. Dekel
  7. M. Franx
  8. E. Daddi

In Instrumentation

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. M. Franx
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. A. Dekel
  6. C. Conroy
  7. E. Daddi
  8. A. Renzini

Citations in the corpus