Host Volatile Attractants and Traps for Detection of Tetropium fuscum (F.), Tetropium castaneum L., and Other Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

By J. Sweeney, P. de Groot, L. Macdonald, Sandy M. Smith, C. Cocquempot, M. Kenis, J. Gutowski. 2004

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Cortical and sapwood volatiles were collected in situ from red spruce, Picea rubens (Sarg.), trees infested with Tetropium fuscum (F.), to determine the relative concentrations and enantiomer ratios of monoterpenes emitted. This information was used to create a synthetic “spruce blend” lure that was tested in various trap designs for efficacy in capturing T. fuscum, and Tetropium castaneum L. in field bioassays conducted on McNabs Island, Nova Scotia, in 2001 and 2002 and in Poland and Switzerland in 2002. Response of other cerambycid species was measured opportunistically. Cross-vane pan traps baited with spruce blend caught significantly more T. fuscum than unbaited traps or traps baited with racemic α-pinene, ethanol, or both. The addition of an ethanol lure to spruce blend–baited traps significantly increased capture of T. fuscum and T. castaneum. There were no significant differences among trap designs in mean catch of either Tetropium species. Spruce blend was also significantly attractive to Monochamus urussovii (Fischer) and, when paired with an ethanol lure, was significantly attractive to Spondylis buprestoides L. Asemum striatum L. was significantly attracted to racemic α-pinene but was not attracted to spruce blend or spruce blend plus ethanol. None of the lures tested were significantly attractive to Stictoleptura rubra L. or Alosterna tabacicolor (DeGeer).

Subfields: Cell Biology, Ecology, Endocrinology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/956e6911f14f7937eccfa45f57de4bc8bb3ed6b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

  1. E. Brockerhoff

In Ecology

  1. E. Brockerhoff
  2. B. Richardson
  3. D. Suckling
  4. Andrew M. Liebhold
  5. R. Epanchin‐Niell
  6. Michael J. Wingfield
  7. R. Haack
  8. P. Tobin

In Endocrinology

  1. E. Brockerhoff

Citations in the corpus