The costs of multiple patch use by birds

By Shelley A. Hinsley. Landscape Ecology, 2000

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/954e26507b3223884acc93c75bb9d2d6d9ab9ab6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades (2002, background): “Yellowhammers providing food for nestlings forage in a patchy habitat: if insect-rich patches become rarer, supply rates to young will decrease, leading to reduced productivity (Hinsley 2000; Morris et al. 2001).”
Impact of grassland farming intensification on the breeding ecology of an indicator insectivorous passerine, the Whinchat Saxicola rubetra: Lessons for overall Alpine meadowland management (2006, result): “Results strongly supporting this view have been obtained in several species: Grey Partridge (Potts and Aebischer, 1995), Skylark (Poulsen et al., 1998; Wilson et al., 1997), Corn bunting (Brickle et al., 2000), Yellowhammer ( Hinsley, 2000 ).”
MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY (2005, background): “…of nesting places or burrows with respect to landscape structure and known food sources (of similar or different quality) would also prove particularly useful to assess the travel costs implied when provisioning or hoarding food within heterogeneous landscapes (Huhta et al. 1999, Hinsley 2000).”
Gap‐crossing movements predict species occupancy in Amazonian forest fragments (2009, background): “However, even for highly vagile species, the energetic costs of trap-lining multiple patches may represent a mechanism by which fragmentation reduces the reproductive potential of species occupying small and isolated (but potentially high-habitat quality) patches (Hinsley 2000).”
Effects of structural and functional habitat gaps on breeding woodland birds: working harder for less (2008, background): “Thus birds living in patchy habitat may have to travel more widely in search of food, increasing their workload (Eybert et al. 1995; Hinsley 2000).”
Climate‐induced resource bottlenecks exacerbate species vulnerability: a review (2015, background): “Constraints on mobility include limited locomotive ability or reluctance to cross gaps (Hinsley, 2000; Goldingay & Taylor, 2009; Lees & Peres, 2009).”
Generalized avian dispersal syndrome contributes to Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum, Euphorbiaceae) invasiveness (2002, background): “…we found that higher numbers of birds foraged for longer durations in both habitats in South Carolina, a pattern expected if increased patchiness of highquality food contributes to more birds foraging for a greater amount of time (Kamil et al ., 1993; Kohlmann & Risenhoover, 1998; Hinsley, 2000).”
Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models (2002, background): “Such travel costs likely include predation risk as well as energy and time budget currencies (Bernstein et al. 1991; Beauchamp et al. 1997; Hinsley 2000).”