Causal holographic information

By V. Hubeny, M. Rangamani. 2012

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A bstractWe propose a measure of holographic information based on a causal wedge construction. The motivation behind this comes from an attempt to understand how boundary field theories can holographically reconstruct spacetime. We argue that given the knowledge of the reduced density matrix in a spatial region of the boundary, one should be able to reconstruct at least the corresponding bulk causal wedge. In attempt to quantify the ‘amount of information’ contained in a given spatial region in field theory, we consider a particular bulk surface (specifically a co-dimension two surface in the bulk spacetime which is an extremal surface on the boundary of the bulk causal wedge), and propose that the area of this surface, measured in Planck units, naturally quantifies the information content. We therefore call this area the causal holographic information. We also contrast our ideas with earlier studies of holographic entanglement entropy. In particular, we establish that the causal holographic information, whilst not being a von Neumann entropy, curiously enough agrees with the entanglement entropy in all cases where one has a microscopic understanding of entanglement entropy.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9546e69b9ccd87422c8cffa3d169836cba4318ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Harlow
  2. R. Myers
  3. V. Hubeny
  4. J. Maldacena
  5. D. Stanford
  6. T. Takayanagi
  7. S. Raju
  8. M. Rangamani

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. D. Harlow
  2. R. Myers
  3. J. Maldacena
  4. S. Raju
  5. T. Takayanagi
  6. D. Stanford
  7. V. Hubeny
  8. M. Rangamani

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. D. Harlow
  2. R. Myers
  3. S. Raju
  4. D. Stanford
  5. J. Maldacena
  6. Aitor Lewkowycz
  7. T. Takayanagi
  8. Ahmed Almheiri

Citations in the corpus