About linear and quadratic Solid-Shell elements at large deformations
By M. Harnau, Karl Schweizerhof. 2002
62 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9544f02599083acf83ae844c0d3ee0cefd7b4147
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Esben Lindgaard
- Erik Lund
- Michael Bruyneel
- Mathias Stolpe
- Rouhollah Tavakoli
- C. F. Hvejsel
- Kazem Ghabraie
- Ole Thomsen
In Control and Systems Engineering
In Mechanics of Materials
- Esben Lindgaard
- Erik Lund
- Michael Bruyneel
- Mathias Stolpe
- Rouhollah Tavakoli
- C. F. Hvejsel
- Kazem Ghabraie
- Ole Thomsen
Citations in the corpus
- Optimization formulations for the maximum nonlinear buckling load of composite structures (2011, methodology): “The element used is an eight node isoparametric element where shear locking and trapezoidal locking is avoided by using the concepts of assumed natural strains for respectively out of plane shear interpolation, see Dvorkin and Bathe (1984), and through the thickness interpolation, see Harnau and Sc”
- A reduced integration solid‐shell finite element based on the EAS and the ANS concept—Geometrically linear problems (2009, unknown): “[25] and Harnau and Schweizerhof [26] worked with selective reduced integration where the volumetric part is evaluated in the center of the element.”
- A new one‐point quadrature enhanced assumed strain (EAS) solid‐shell element with multiple integration points along thickness—part II: nonlinear applications (2006, unknown): “This example has been treated before in many references, for instance References [7, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 54].”