Switchgrass production for the upper southeastern USA: Influence of cultivar and cutting frequency on biomass yields
By J. Fike, D. Parrish, D. D. Wolf, J. A. Balasko, J. J. Green, M. Rasnake, J. H. Reynolds. 2006
197 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/954066e0a99f0e9bf5692aec03bbf251986cf13a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
In Biomedical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Seasonal nitrogen dynamics of Miscanthus×giganteus and Panicum virgatum (2009, result): “An October harvest is consistent with recommendations for biomass production of P. virgatum (Fike et al., 2006; Parrish et al., 2008), but represents a significant deviation from some European findings on M. giganteus that showed significant reductions in [N] from delaying harvest over winter…”
- Evaluation of ammonia fibre expansion (AFEX) pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass harvested in different seasons and locations (2010, unknown): “one harvest in October [6].”
- Switchgrass Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics (2012, unknown): “Data were collected from [3] (Arlington and Spooner, WI; Mead, NE; Manhattan, KS; Stillwater, OK), [95] (Hope, AR; College Station, Dallas, and Stephenville, TX), [96] (Princeton, KY; Raleigh, NC; Jackson and Knoxville, TN; Blacksburg and Orange, VA; Morgantown, WV), [97] (Chariton, IA); and [4] (Be”