Camera-trap avoidance by Kinkajous Potos fl avus: rethinking the "non-invasive" paradigm

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Arboreal camera trapping: taking a proven method to new heights (2014, background): “For example, use of a flowering or fruiting tree may be monitored through all stages of development (Ganesh &Devy 2006), or use of a particular branch or a crossing point between forest fragments may be observed (Schipper 2007).”
Estimating mammalian species richness and occupancy in tropical forest canopies with arboreal camera traps (2017, background): “2014), and to monitor the use of particular habitat features such as feeding trees by Yakushima macaques (Macaca fuscata yakui) (Otani 2001) and Kinkajous (Potos flavus) (Schipper 2007), or natural canopy ‘bridges’ left over oil pipelines (Gregory et al.”
A review of factors to consider when using camera traps to study animal behavior to inform wildlife ecology and conservation (2020, unknown): “…CTs mitigate several methodological risks, the impacts of CT technology itself on wildlife have been given limited attention (but see Séquin, Jaeger, Brussard, & Barrett, 2003; Schipper, 2007; Gibeau & McTavish, 2009; Meek et al., 2014; Meek, Ballard, Fleming, & Falzon, 2016; Kalan et al., 2019).”