Spatial home-range overlap and temporal interaction in eastern coyotes: the influence of pair types and fragmentation

By T. Atwood, H. P. Weeks. 2003

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Kin-related spatial structure in brown bears Ursus arctos (2005, methodology): “The multiannual home-range overlap between dyads of adult female bears was expressed as a percentage calculated by the formula: (Oij/(Ai+Aj))×2, where Oij is the area of overlap between bear i and bear j, and Ai and Aj are the areas of the multiannual home ranges of bear i and bear j, respectively (”
New Radiocollars for the Detection of Proximity among Individuals (2006, background): “Prange et al. Proximity Detectors for Wildlife 1333 Many studies utilize radiotelemetry as a means of assessing intraspecific contacts (Gehrt and Fritzell 1998, White et al. 2000, Blundell et al. 2002, Ramsey et al. 2002, Atwood and Weeks 2003).”
Evidence of social communities in a spatially structured network of a free-ranging shark species (2012, background): “While the importance of social behaviour for spatial use has been widely investigated among terrestrial predators (Sandell 1989; Atwood & Weeks 2003; Wagner et al. 2008) and marine mammals (Lusseau et al. 2006; Wiszniewski et al. 2009; Frère et al. 2010), such information is still missing in most…”