DIEL VARIATIONS IN OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF MICROMONAS PUSILLA (PRASINOPHYCEAE) 1

By Michele D. DuRand, R. Green, H. Sosik, R. Olson. 2002

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/686c1c74a98d82594719b69429114cc03155f94f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Light and photosynthetic microalgae: A review of cellular- and molecular-scale optical processes (2018, background): “The shape of the absorption spectrum did not have diurnal variations in a study using Micromonas pusilla (DuRand et al. 2002), whereas in papers by (Mercado et al.”
Late summer community composition and abundance of photosynthetic picoeukaryotes in Norwegian and Barents Seas (2005, background): “Based on an average content of 0.025 pg Chl a per cell (DuRand et al. 2002) and TSA-FISH quantification, we estimated that this species contributed to only 7% of the picoplanktonic Chl a biomass in Arctic waters, although it accounted for 32% of the picoeukaryote cells.”
Estimates of virus- vs. grazing induced mortality of picophytoplankton in the North Sea during summer (2008, methodology): “For the picoeukaryotes, we used a biovolume to carbon conversion factor of 239 fg µm–3, an average of the values obtained for Ostreococcus sp. CCE9901 (233 to 247 fg C µm–3; Worden et al. 2004) and Micromonas pusilla CCMP 489 (238 fg µm–3; DuRand et al. 2002).”
Assessing the dynamics and ecology of marine picophytoplankton: The importance of the eukaryotic component (2004, methodology): “The calculated biovolumes were used to estimate carbon content on the basis of a carbon conversion factor generated with triplicate diel CHN measurements of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus (Nolan, unpubl. data) as well as M. pusilla (DuRand et al. 2002), a phytoplankter also found at this site.”
The role of viruses in marine phytoplankton mortality (2007, unknown): “For the picoeukaryotes, we used a biovolume to carbon conversion factor of 239 fg C µm-3, an average of the values obtained for Ostreococcus sp. CCE9901 (233 – 247 fg C µm-3, Worden et al. 2004) and Micromonas pusilla CCMP 489 (238 fg C µm-3, DuRand et al. 2002).”
Late summer phytoplankton distribution along a 3500 km transect in Canadian Arctic waters: strong numerical dominance by picoeukaryotes (2009, background): “In addition, the duration of the production period is sensitive to the seasonal melt dynamics of sea ice (Fortier et al. 2002).”
Nutrient limitation of picophytoplankton photosynthesis and growth in the tropical North Atlantic (2008, background): “In AFC, fluorescence per cell can be used as a proxy for cellular pigment content, and side scatter per cell can be used as a proxy of cell size (DuRand et al. 2002).”
Viruses as mortality agents of picophytoplankton in the deep chlorophyll maximum layer during IRONAGES III (2007, methodology): “For the picoeukaryotes, we used a biovolume to carbon conversion factor of 239 fg C mm23, an average of the values obtained for Ostreococcus sp. CCE9901 (233–247 fg C mm23; Worden et al. 2004) and M. pusilla CCMP 489 (238 fg C mm23; DuRand et al. 2002).”
Contribution of picoplankton to the total particulate organic carbon concentration in the eastern South Pacific (2007, methodology): “Only data collected at local noon time were used to estimate group-specific attenuation coefficients, to avoid errors associated with the natural diel variability that has been observed in the refractive index of picophytoplankton cells from culture (e.g. Stramski et al., 1995; DuRand and Olson, 199”