A Completely Blind Video Integrity Oracle
By Anish Mittal, Michele A. Saad, A. Bovik. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2016
361 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95300eab6d201ee29abd7681135f9123c6cce342
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Weisi Lin
- Jari Korhonen
- Zhengzhong Tu
- Yilin Wang
- Balu Adsumilli
- Neil Birkbeck
- Chaofeng Chen
- Haoning Wu
Citations in the corpus
- UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content (2020, methodology): “Among these, NIQE, IL-NIQE, and VIIDEO are “completely blind” (opinion-unaware (OU)), since no training is required to build them.”
- Two-Level Approach for No-Reference Consumer Video Quality Assessment (2019, methodology): “Pixel-based models use a raw video signal solely as an input [4]–[5], [7]–[10], [12], and hybrid models combine features from the bitstream with features extracted from the”
- FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Sampling (2022, methodology): “Classical VQA Methods Classical VQA methods [31,29,20,36,35,25] handcrafted features to evaluate video quality.”
- Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Quality (2018, methodology): “NIQE[36] and VIIDEO [39] are training-free models capable of outputting quality scores on video.”
- Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos (2019, methodology): “Unfortunately, the evaluation of current state-of-the-art NR-VQA methods [28, 35] on these video databases shows a poor performance [10, 23, 31, 42].”