Modelling the dynamic spatio-temporal response of predators to transient prey patches in the field

By L. Winder, C. J. Alexander, John M. Holland, C. Woolley, J. Perry. 2001

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/952f7657d1b92ff43fa18d66550bc79b1625ae60

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Distribution and activity of Drosophila suzukii in cultivated raspberry and surrounding vegetation (2016, background): “…of D. suzukii, that is patches (levels at or above 1.5; traps near each other containing high counts of flies) or areas with below-average density, that is gaps (levels below 1.5; traps near each other with low counts of flies) (Winder et al. 2001, 2012; Maestre and Cortina 2002; De Villiers 2006).”
Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data (2002, methodology): “A specific extension to spatial association (Winder et al. 2001) is made by comparing the clustering indices of two sets of data across the sample units.”
Farm‐scale spatiotemporal dynamics of predatory beetles in arable crops (2005, background): “2001) or in different parts of the same field; Poecilus cupreus remained close to hedgerows, while the reverse was found for Pterostichus melanarius (Fournier & Loreau 1999; Winder et al. 2001).”
Efficacy and economics of shelter habitats for conservation biological control (2008, background): “…level numerous studies have shown that fungal pathogens, aphid specific predators, parasitoids and polyphagous predators can considerably reduce peak aphid numbers and/or yield loss (Chambers et al., 1986; Ostman et al., 2003; Schmidt et al., 2004; Winder et al., 2001, 2005; Holland et al., 2006).”
Model evaluation of the function of prey in non-crop habitats for biological control by ladybeetles in agricultural landscapes (2004, unknown): “…that incorporate spatial processes (Banks et al., 1988; Corbett and Plant, 1993; Brewster et al., 1997; Grunbaum, 1998; Legaspi et al., 1998; Winder et al., 2001), our model contains in general a more detailed description of phenology, reproduction, dispersal, population and predation…”
Clusters in earthworm spatial distribution (2003, methodology): “In addition, the spatial association between clusters of both earthworm groups was assessed using the new SADIE extension proposed by Winder et al. (2001).”
A new method to measure spatial association for ecological count data (2002, methodology): “By analogy, what is needed now is a method that provides a measure and map of local association and that quantifies the degree to which each unit contributes to an overall measure of spatial association (Winder et al., 2001).”
Vegetation increases the abundance of natural enemies in vineyards (2009, methodology): “2) program (Winder et al., 2001).”
Mitigating the effects of insecticides on arthropod biological control at field and landscape scales (2014, background): “For example, Winder et al. (2001) conducted a field-scale study on the spatio-temporal dynamics of two aphid species (Metopolophium dirhodum Walker and Sitobion avenae F.) and a generalist predator, the carabid Pterostichus melanarius Illiger, and found a strong response by the beetle population to…”