Financial development and environmental quality in UAE: Cointegration with structural breaks

449 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Sustainability of the Moderating Role of Financial Development in the Determinants of Environmental Degradation: Evidence from Turkey (2021, methodology): “In addition, the significance of financial development as a determinant of carbon emissions is consistent with Alom et al. [87], Charfeddine and Khediri [86], Kong and Wei [88], Nasreem et al. [90], Shahbaz et al. [39], and Xu et al. [84].”
Is it possible to improve environmental quality without reducing economic growth: Evidence from the Qatar economy (2018, background): “Other studies have confirmed the existence of the growth hypothesis between energy consumption and economic growth, including Chontanawat et al. (2006) for Oman country and Squalli (2007) for Kuwait.”
Does financial development influence renewable energy consumption to achieve carbon neutrality in the USA (2021, background): “…existing literature on environmental effects of financial development where the evidence on finance-environment nexus is inconclusive (e.g., Nasir et al. 2019, Nguyen et al. 2021, Salahuddin et al. 2018, Shahbaz et al. 2018, Charfeddine and Khediri 2016, Çoban and Topcu 2013, Tamazian et al. 2009).”
Does financial development asymmetrically affect CO2 emissions in China? An application of the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model (2018, background): “[71] Turkey ESB Cointegration DCPS FD negatively affects CO2 emissions.”