High-Tech Clusters, Technology Spillovers and Trade Secret Laws

By Andrea Fosfuri, Thomas Rønde. 2004

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9521510c5fed1049cc77d76ce4c8c4dda0ad1469

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature (2006, background): “F osfuri and R onde ( 2004 ) also show not only that voluntary contracts may reduce the amount of spillovers of embodied knowledge through mobile employees, but also that trade secret laws, which forbid employees to use knowledge acquired with an old employer at their new firm, reduce spillovers a”
Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows (2009, background): “If one has to conclude that the observed localization of patent citations captures the true localization of knowledge spillovers, one should embark upon the difficult task to classify the types of relationships between knowledge-exchanging agents and to weigh the importance of cases that cannot be r”
(How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? (2005, background): “Fosfuri and Ronde ( 2004 ) analyse firms' incentives to cluster in an industrial district to benefit from reciprocal technology spillovers by presenting a model of cumulative innovation, where technology spillovers arise endogenously through labour mobility.”
Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity (2013, background): “Whereas recent advances acknowledge the deterrence-potential of selective revealing (Clarkson & Toh, 2010; Polidoro & Toh, 2011), there is limited research on the collaborative aspects of selective revealing (Fosfuri & Rønde, 2004; Henkel, 2005).”
Does the Mobility of R&D Labor Increase Innovation? (2015, background): “There are opposing effects of labor mobility on the joint profit of the firms (Combes and Duranton, 2006; Fosfuri and Rønde, 2004).”
Covenants Not to Compete, Labor Mobility, and Industry Dynamics (2008, unknown): “The implication of (12) is that, for all between zero and one, there are that lead to spin-outs in region 2; namely, rms with < 1=3 always let workers go, regardless of .”