Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians*

By Eric J. Thomas, J. Sexton, R. Helmreich. Critical Care Medicine, 2003

809 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care* (2005, background): “Significant 19 (35) 30 (46) 49 (41) 57 (43) 44 (49) 101 (45) Severe 28 (52) 27 (41) 55 (46) 57 (43) 41 (46) 98 (44) Life-threatening 5 (9) 9 (14) 14 (12) 19 (14) 5 (6) 24 (11) Fatal 2 (4) 0 (0) 2 (2) NA NA NA Total 54 66 120 133 90 223”
Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature (2009, result): “In one study, nurses’ ratings of the quality of collaboration and communication with physicians (33% positive ratings) were compared with physicians’ ratings of the quality of collaboration and communication with nurses (73% positive ratings).(44) Another study contrasted surgeons’ ratings of their ”
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research (2006, methodology): “The equipment in this ICU is adequate Working conditions: perceived quality of the work environment and logistical support (staffing, equipment etc.) –”
Nurse-physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: Collaboration, moral distress, and ethical climate* (2007, background): “Differences in perspective between RNs and MDs may be due to differences in their position responsibilities, status/ authority, gender, or training and/or the differences in medical and nursing cultures (37, 54).”