Detecting Threats of Violence in Online Discussions Using Bigrams of Important Words

By Hugo Hammer. 2014

20 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Natural Language Processing, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Bertie Vidgen
2. Helen Z. Margetts
3. Dong Nguyen
4. Patrícia G. C. Rossini
5. Rebekah Tromble
6. Zeerak Talat
7. Douwe Kiela

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bertie Vidgen
2. Helen Z. Margetts
3. Dong Nguyen

In Natural Language Processing

1. Bertie Vidgen
2. Helen Z. Margetts
3. Dong Nguyen
4. Rebekah Tromble
5. Zeerak Talat
6. Svetlana Kiritchenko
7. Isar Nejadgholi
8. Douwe Kiela

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

1. Dong Nguyen
2. Helen Z. Margetts
3. Bertie Vidgen
4. Rebekah Tromble

Citations in the corpus

• Introducing CAD: the Contextual Abuse Dataset (2021, background): “…2014; Citron and Norton, 2011) yet usually it is part of an ‘explicit’ hate category (Zampieri et al., 2019; Wulczyn et al., 2017; Waseem and Hovy, 2016) and few datasets have treated it as a separate category, see Golbeck et al. (2017), Anzovino et al. (2018), and Hammer (2014) for exceptions.”