Antiretroviral therapy adherence and viral suppression in HIV-infected drug users: comparison of self-report and electronic monitoring.
By J. Arnsten, P. Demas, H. Farzadegan, Richard W. Grant, M. Gourevitch, C. Chang, D. Buono, H. Eckholdt, A. Howard, E. Schoenbaum. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
687 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Infectious Diseases, Virology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d4e017d318664459736e98292e3d7d60e32b999
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob
- H. Crane
- S. Czajkowski
- Jane M. Simoni
- M. Hilliard
- J. Aikens
- C. Hunter
- D. Velligan
Citations in the corpus
- Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use (2015, background): “typically indicates that self-report measures have weaker or less consistent relations with clinical outcomes relative to other measures of adherence [18, 51, 54].”
- Impact of HIV-Related Stigma on Health Behaviors and Psychological Adjustment Among HIV-Positive Men and Women (2006, background): “Prior research confirms that a 7 day assessment interval provides a valid estimate of adherence that correlates with electronic (MEMS) monitoring data and is predictive of viral load (Arnsten et al., 2001).”
- Self-Report Measures of Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence: A Review with Recommendations for HIV Research and Clinical Management (2006, background): “Because of these limitations, some researchers have suggested that EDM or other less subjective methods may be preferable to self-report for adherence assessment in intervention trials (Miller & Hays, 2000).”
- Medication adherence in HIV-infected adults: effect of patient age, cognitive status, and substance abuse (2004, background): “It is well accepted that self-report techniques, particularly when used to assess ‘socially undesirable’ behaviors such as failing to adhere to physicians' instructions, lack precision, and frequently underestimate the behavior in question [13,34].”