Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations

By M. Cole, Robert J. R. Elliott. 2003

878 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94eb9910066325d525d8abf80de560b9ac77a996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Do Environmental Regulations Influence Trade Patterns? Testing Old and New Trade Theories (2003, neutral): “During this time, a large literature examining different aspects of the tradeenvironment relationship has developed (see e.g. Siebert et al. 1980, Anderson and Blackhurst 1992, Chichilnisky 1994, Copeland and Taylor 1994, 1995, Antweiler et al. 2001, Cole and Elliott 2003).”
CO2 Emissions, Research and Technology Transfer in China (2009, neutral): “However, Antweiler et al. (2001) and Cole and Elliott (2003), among others, postulate that the environmental impact of trade liberalization can be decomposed into scale (size of economy), technique (production methods) and composition (specialization) effects.”
The Influencing Factors of CO2 Emissions and the Role of Biomass Energy Consumption: Statistical Experience from G-7 Countries (2018, background): “Moreover, Cole and Elliott [39] establish that trade openness would increase the production share in countries with comparative advantages.”
CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis (2015, background): “The impact of international trade on environment has been investigated by Antweiler et al. (2001) and Cole and Elliott (2003).”
Has the development of FDI and foreign trade contributed to China’s CO2 emissions? An empirical study with provincial panel data (2015, background): “Cole and Elliott (2003) argued that pollution-intensive sectors may be subject to opposing forces of comparative advantage since these sectors were also typically capital intensive, yet regions with low environmental regulations tended to be least abundant in capital stock.”
Exporters and the environment (2016, neutral): “In this 14See Cole and Elliott (2003) and Bernard and Jensen (2004) for evidence on each of those claims respectively. framework, exporters are larger than their competitors due to their productivity advantages.”
The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Europe (2021, background): “Earlier studies (Frankel, 2005; Cole, 2004; Cole and Elliott, 2003) questioned this positive effect and used different types of pollution emissions.”
Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes (2012, background): “6 Krueger (1995) and Cole and Elliot (2003) among others in which per capita GDP measures are used as determinants of pollution.”
Trade, environmental regulations and industrial mobility: An industry-level study of Japan (2010, background): “More specifically, since pollution intensive industries are typically the most capital intensive, these different pressures may actually compete against each other and hence tend to cancel out (Antweiler et al. 2001, Cole and Elliott 2003b and Cole and Elliott 2005).”
Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 in Canada (2010, background): “These papers include Cole and Elliott (2003), Cole (2004), Roca et al.”
Industrial activity and the environment in China: An industry-level analysis (2008, background): “Several recent studies have suggested that those sectors that face the largest abatement costs per unit of value added also have the greatest physical capital requirements (Antweiler et al. 2001 and Cole and Elliott 2003, Cole et al. 2005).”