The interpretation of trends from multiple yield maps
By S. Blackmore. 2000
205 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Environmental Engineering, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94e6b26b0a648fc697c0c8db8f9dd40289d5d494
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Chemistry
In Environmental Engineering
- J. Ping
- Guoling Shi
- Chunguang Li
- Francesca Guastaferro
- Li Wang
- D. Sollitto
- Barbara Cafarelli
- Ling Li
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- A comparison of different algorithms for the delineation of management zones (2010, background): “Another approach is based on crop yield maps (Blackmore 2000; Diker et al. 2004; Basso et al. 2007) and aerial photographs of growing crops (Basso et al.”
- Classification of Crop Yield Variability in Irrigated Production Fields (2003, methodology): “MCV-3 Empirical categorization of three yield classes based onMSD-4: Four yield classes were arbitrarily defined using mean and CV of yield (Blackmore, 2000) the maps of mean relative yield and its SD among years at MSD-3 Empirical categorization of three yield classes based on mean and standard…”
- Evaluating Management Zone Optimal Nitrogen Rates with a Crop Growth Model (2006, background): “Many approaches to MZ delineation have been proposed and evaluated (Mulla, 1991; Fleming et al., 2000, 2004; Blackmore, 2000; Fraisse et al., 2001a; Khosla et al., 2002; Diker et al., 2004; Chang et al., 2004; Miao et al., 2005); however, the biggest challenge facing the producer is how to manage in”
- Exploring spatial dependence of cotton yield using global and local autocorrelation statistics (2004, methodology): “To make the cotton yields comparable among different years, cotton lint yields were first standardized by their average for a given year (Blackmore, 2000) by using Eq.”
- Management Effects on Relationships of Crop Yields with Topography Represented by Wetness Index and Precipitation (2008, methodology): “For analyses that involved comparisons among the crops, the original yields were standardized (Blackmore, 2000; Perez-Quezada et al., 2003) as Y si = R si /Y s [1] where Y si is the standardized yield of the ith cell in the sth year, R si is the actual yield for the ith cell in the sth year, and Y…”
- Combined Spectral and Spatial Modeling of Corn Yield Based on Aerial Images and Crop Surface Models Acquired with an Unmanned Aircraft System (2014, background): “Another approach is using yield maps, providing information about spatial and temporal variability of yields in previous years [8].”