Mammoth and Mastodon collagen sequences; survival and utility
By M. Buckley, N. Larkin, Matthew J. Collins. 2011
84 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anthropology, Archeology, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94d79ba11ab45e4ad9e457080e1d228afa080a47
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Anthropology
- Virginia L. Harvey
- A. T. Chamberlain
- N. Melton
- M. Buckley
- J. Herman
- Sheena Fraser
- J. Mulville
- A. Pálsdóttir
In Archeology
- Virginia L. Harvey
- A. T. Chamberlain
- N. Melton
- J. Herman
- Sheena Fraser
- J. Mulville
- A. Pálsdóttir
- M. Buckley
In Paleontology
- Virginia L. Harvey
- A. T. Chamberlain
- N. Melton
- M. Buckley
- J. Herman
- Kenneth F. Rijsdijk
- Sheena Fraser
- J. Mulville
Citations in the corpus
- Species identification of archaeological marine mammals using collagen fingerprinting (2014, background): “It has beenwell established that collagen sequences can be used in the discrimination of mammals at the family (Buckley et al., 2011), genus (Buckley et al.”
- Combining histology, stable isotope analysis and ZooMS collagen fingerprinting to investigate the taphonomic history and dietary behaviour of extinct giant tortoises from the Mare aux Songes deposit on Mauritius (2014, background): “, 2010) ormammoths from mastodons (Buckley et al., 2011), may not be necessary for the analysis of non-mammalian remains.”
- Species identification and decay assessment of Late Pleistocene fragmentary vertebrate remains from Pin Hole Cave (Creswell Crags, UK) using collagen fingerprinting (2017, methodology): “ously known exception (Buckley et al. 2011), and to the species level with some (Rybczynski et al.”