Condition indices for conservation: new uses for evolving tools.

By R. Stevenson, W. Woods. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2006

511 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94cde4c766f115fd7f39bef633922dd24fde70d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Peig
2. A. Green
3. C. T. Marshall
4. Dennis Murray
5. W. Lowe
6. Richard J. Smith
7. D. Ardia
8. J. Figuerola

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Peig
2. A. Green
3. S. Meier
4. C. T. Marshall
5. W. Lowe
6. Dennis Murray
7. Richard J. Smith
8. D. Ardia

Citations in the corpus

• New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method (2009, methodology): “We are concerned from hereon only with CIs based on mass data and morphometric measures (see Stevenson and Woods 2006 for review of other nondestructive CIs).”
• Inconsistencies in measurement of fish condition: a comparison of four indices of fat reserves for Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) (2011, background): “The most common morphometric condition index is K (Stevenson and Woods, 2006), also known as Fulton’s K (Nash et al.”
• The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length (2010, methodology): “A wide range of morphological, biochemical or physiological metrics have been proposed as condition indices (CIs) (Stevenson & Woods 2006).”