Biochemistry of female moth sex pheromones

By R. Jurenka. 2003

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94c9ae00903b9f8657af557bd71c3cff3515bcd9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. R. Howard
2. G. Blomquist
3. A. Groot

In Insect Science

1. R. Howard
2. G. Blomquist
3. A. Groot

Citations in the corpus

• Circadian rhythms of sexual activities in moths: a review (2014, background): “…be synchronous with female calling (e.g., Fatzinger, 1973; Coffelt et al., 1978; Pope et al., 1982; Raina et al., 1986, 1989; Rafaeli and Soroker, 1989; Raina, 1993; Ramaswamy et al., 1995; Iglesias et al., 1999, 2002; Foster, 2000; Dong and Du, 2001; Rafaeli and Jurenka, 2003; Xiang et al., 2010).”
• Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. (2005, background): “A remarkable specificity occurs in several lepidopterans, in which shorter chain pheromone or pheromone precursor hydrocarbons (69, 70, 98) are synthesized by oenocytes and then cotransported by lipophorin along with the very-long-chain cuticular hydrocarbons.”