Technology: The $1,000 genome

By E. Hayden. Nature, 2014

375 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

It’s all in the timing: calibrating temporal penalties for biomedical data sharing (2018, background): “These rationales include (1) making results available to the public, (2) stewarding the resources applied to collect and curate data, (3) reproducing and verifying results, (4) enabling new investigations using one or more data sources, and (5) advancing research and innovation.”
Trends and management implications of human-influenced life-history changes in marine ectotherms (2016, background): “Even when monitoring data are collected for other purposes, it should be imperative to 619 preserve material in ways that will be suitable for retrospective genomic analyses, particularly given the 620 rapid decrease in analysis costs (Hayden 2014).”
RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes (2015, background): “As sequencing technology has advanced and the cost has dropped, the number of genomes being deposited into the public databases has outpaced Moore’s Law 1,2 .”
ISFETs in CMOS and Emergent Trends in Instrumentation: A Review (2016, background): “ISFETs have allowed to carry out numerous projects, amongst them the ’Human Genome Project’, which has seen the price of genome sequencing dropping at a rate steadier than Moore’s law since 2010 [3].”