Variation in the realization of glottalization in normal speakers

By Laura Redi, S. Shattuck-Hufnagel. J. Phonetics, 2001

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review (2010, background): “Dilley, Shattuck-Hufnagel, and Ostendorf (1996) and Redi and Shattuck-Hufnagel (2001) show evidence that glottal stop insertion is more likely at stronger prosodic domain breaks compared with weaker boundaries.”
Prosody in context: a review (2015, background): “…lengthening, strengthening and F0 effects of prosodic phrase boundaries, certain laryngeal effects such as glottalization of domain-initial sonorants and creaky voice in the final region of the prosodic phrase are observed in American English (Dilley et al., 1996; Redi & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2001).”
A Prosodic View of Word Form Encoding for Speech Production (2002, background): “Redi and Shattuck-Hufnagel (2001) report that final creak is more likely at the end of a Full Intonational Phrase than at the end of an Intermediate Intonational Phrase, a constituent which is lower on the hierarchy.”