Fast learning for problem classes using knowledge based network initialization
By Michael Hüsken, Christian Goerick. 2000
24 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
- Yoshua Bengio
- Trevor Darrell
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Quoc V. Le
- Abhishek Gupta
In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
- Sergey Levine
- Chelsea Finn
- Pieter Abbeel
- Andrei A. Rusu
- Ignasi Clavera
- John Schulman
- Jakub Sygnowski
- Tamim Asfour
Citations in the corpus
- Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks (2017, background): “Most of these works have considered good random initial-izations, though a number of papers have addressed data-dependent initializers (Kr¨ahenb¨uhl et al., 2016; Salimans & Kingma, 2016), including learned initializations (Husken & Goerick, 2000; Maclaurin et al., 2015).”
- Meta-Learning and Universality: Deep Representations and Gradient Descent can Approximate any Learning Algorithm (2017, methodology): “In contrast to the aforementioned approaches, more recent work has proposed methods that include the structure of optimization problems into the meta-learner (Ravi & Larochelle, 2017; Finn et al., 2017a; Husken & Goerick, 2000).”
- Model-Based Reinforcement Learning via Meta-Policy Optimization (2018, background): “The last category embeds the structure of optimization problems into the meta-learning algorithm [11, 39, 40].”
- Meta-learning by the Baldwin effect (2018, methodology): “ave been applied to few-shot image recognition [22] and reinforcement learning [8, 31]. More recent approaches propose to include the inductive bias of optimization-based learning into a meta-learner [13, 21, 9]. Particularly related to this work is model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) approach [9], ”