Functional diversity of crustacean zooplankton communities: towards a trait‐based classification

By A. Barnett, K. Finlay, B. Beisner. 2007

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9468b5b80eb17bd84111f136a206cdcd3e27d93c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Environmental Chemistry

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Cladocera as indicators of trophic state in Irish lakes (2010, background): “Body length and habitat preference are important functional properties for cladocerans, and compositional shifts in functional groups possessing these ecological properties can be used to infer changes in size-selective predation and habitat ( Barnett et al. 2007 ).”
Evaluation of functional trait diversity for marine zooplankton communities in the Northeast subarctic Pacific Ocean (2015, background): “Body length can be considered as a key structuring trait in zooplankton influencing, predator–prey relationship, energy content as well as metabolic rates such as growth and fecundity (Barnett et al., 2007; Barton et al., 2013).”
Using functional traits to investigate the determinants of crustacean zooplankton community structure (2013, methodology): “Finally, we rates (Haney 1985, Nandini and Sarma 2003, Barnett et al. 2007).”
Trait-Based Community Ecology of Phytoplankton (2008, background): “Depending on what traits are included in the cluster analysis, dendrograms can differ significantly, so the task is to identify the most important traits (Barnett et al. 2007, Petchey & Gaston 2006).”
Salinity shapes zooplankton communities and functional diversity and has complex effects on size structure in lakes (2018, methodology): “In recent years, an increasing number of studies have been conducted to classify aquatic communities based on their functional characteristics in order to examine FD patterns as well as to find appropriate functional indicators of environmental changes (McGill et al., 2006; Barnett et al., 2007; Hei”
How functional is functional? Ecological groupings in terrestrial animal ecology: towards an animal functional type approach (2011, background): “In any case, classification of species into EGs needs rigorous testing to ensure validity of assumptions and results (Barnett et al. 2007).”
From plant functional types to plant functional traits (2015, background): “Vegetation classification in DGVMs would greatly enhance our ability to predict both pulsed and gradual environmental changes (Barnett et al., 2007).”