X-Ray Spectroscopic Evidence for Intermediate-Mass Black Holes: Cool Accretion Disks in Two Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources

By J. Miller, G. Fabbiano, M. Miller, A. M. C. F. Astrophysics, U. Maryland, U. I. D. O. Astronomy. 2002

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have analyzed an XMM-Newton observation of the nearby spiral galaxy NGC 1313, which contains two "ultraluminous" X-ray (ULX) sources. We measure isotropic luminosities of LX = 2.0 × 1040 ergs s-1 and LX = 6.6 × 1039 ergs s-1 for NGC 1313 X-1 and X-2 (0.2-10.0 keV, assuming a distance of 3.7 Mpc). The spectra statistically require soft and hard spectral components to describe the continuum emission; some prior studies of ULX sources have claimed cool soft components with lower statistics. The improvement over several single-component models exceeds the 8 σ level of confidence for X-1; the improvement for X-2 is significant at the 3 σ level. The soft components in these ULX spectra are well fitted by multicolor disk blackbody models with color temperatures of kT ≃ 150 eV. This temperature differs markedly from those commonly measured in the spectra of stellar mass (10 M☉) black holes in their brightest states (kT ≃ 1 keV). It is expected that the temperature of an accretion disk orbiting a black hole should decrease with increasing black hole mass. If the soft components we measure are due to emission from the inner region of an accretion disk, and disks extend close to the innermost stable circular orbit at the accretion rates being probed, the low color temperatures may be interpreted as spectroscopic evidence of black holes with intermediate masses: MBH ≃ 103 M☉. Simple Eddington scaling arguments suggest a minimum mass of MBH ~ 102 M☉. NGC 1313 X-1 and X-2 are found in optical nebulae, which may indicate that anisotropic emission geometries are unlikely to account for the fluxes observed.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/945cbc39dd80315bf9d004620be96ad95f61740f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. Volonteri
  2. M. Mezcua
  3. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  4. H. Feng
  5. R. Soria
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. D. M. Alexander
  8. P. Madau

Citations in the corpus