Validation of qualitative analytical methods

By E. Trullols, I. Ruisánchez, F. Rius. 2004

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Using measurement uncertainty in decision-making and conformity assessment (2014, unknown): “Although ‘qualitative’ analysis has been defined as the ‘Assessment of presence or absence of one or more analytes in sample due to its physical and chemical properties’ (Trullols et al 2004), the decision to classify as go/no-go is not exclusive to qualitative measurement (Pendrill 2011).”
Validation of new methods. (2007, background): “For qualitative procedures, a general validation guideline is currently not available [12], but there seems to be agreement that at least selectivity and the LOD should be evaluated and that additional parameters like precision, recovery and ruggedness (robustness) might also be important [3,12,15,1”